The following testimony was submitted by the Grassroot Institute of Hawaii for consideration by the House Committee on Finance on Feb. 27, 2026.
_____________
Feb 27, 2026, 10 a.m.
Hawaii State Capitol
Conference Room 308 and Videoconference
To: House Committee on Finance
Rep. Chris Todd, Chair
Rep. Jenna Takenouchi, Vice Chair
From: Grassroot Institute of Hawaii
Ted Kefalas, Director of Strategic Campaigns
TESTIMONY IN SUPPORT OF HB2581 HD2 — RELATING TO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Aloha Chair, Vice Chair and other Committee members,
The Grassroot Institute of Hawaii supports HB2581 HD2, which would clarify the definitions of “emergency” and “disaster” in Hawaii’s emergency management statute.
Specifying what constitutes an “emergency” or “disaster” under chapter 127A would go a long way toward addressing the unchecked expansion of executive power via emergency proclamations.
As Grassroot discussed in its January 2021 policy brief “Lockdowns Versus Liberty: How Hawaii’s Experience in 2020-2021 Demonstrates the Need to Revise the State’s Emergency Powers,” the governor of Hawaii has extremely broad powers to define what constitutes an emergency.[1]
This has resulted in an ever-growing list of “emergencies” outside of the “immediate” and “catastrophic” threats described in this bill. Thus, important social issues such as homelessness or the lack of affordable housing seem to have been declared “emergencies” to take advantage of the broad powers granted to the executive branch under the emergency management statute. Moreover, the lack of clarity in the statute has resulted in a Hawaii Supreme Court opinion that largely upheld the use of executive power for this expansive definition of emergencies.[2]
This use of emergency power might be an effective way to streamline decision-making and cut through cumbersome regulations. However, it also upsets the state’s constitutional balance of powers, allows the governor to act as a “super legislator” by waiving or suspending statewide laws, deprives the Legislature of its constitutional prerogative in the crafting of state policy and frustrates efforts to enact permanent reforms.
Governing via executive order also denies the public a voice on important issues, forcing the people to rely on the courts for redress — which is a slow and expensive process that acts as an additional barrier to public input.
Even those who agree with the goals or actions of some of these questionable emergency orders have expressed concern about the justification behind them.
This problem is compounded by the lack of any meaningful time limit on emergency orders. The executive’s ability to extend emergencies via supplemental proclamations means that an abuse of executive power could be extended indefinitely.
Creating a clear definition of what constitutes an “emergency” or “disaster” under the law would limit the potential for executive overreach via emergency orders.
The list of emergency events in HB2581, combined with the bill’s emphasis on immediate danger and timely action, gives a clear indication of legislative intent and would bring the statute in line with the common understanding of an emergency.
The experiences of the past few years have highlighted the need to reform Hawaii’s emergency management statute. There is room to restore the constitutional balance of powers without handicapping the executive’s ability to respond quickly and effectively to emergency situations.
By providing guidance on what an emergency is, this bill would help reassert the Legislature’s role in the use of emergency powers.
Sincerely,
Ted Kefalas
Director of Strategic Campaigns
Grassroot Institute of Hawaii
_____________
[1] Malia Hill, “Lockdowns Versus Liberty: How Hawaii’s Experience in 2020-2021 Demonstrates the Need to Revise the State’s Emergency Powers,” Grassroot Institute of Hawaii, January 2021.
[2] Nakoa v. Governor of the State of Hawaii, 575 P.3d 506 (2025).
