Statement From The James Madison Institute on the District Court Ruling in FTC v. Meta

TALLAHASSEE — Today, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of Meta Platforms, Inc., concluding the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) antitrust trial. The Court’s decision rejected the claim that Meta holds monopoly power, explicitly recognizing that the “personal social networking” market definition is too narrow to reflect the vigorous competition and consumer choice characterizing today’s digital ecosystem.

“Today’s ruling reaffirms that the digital market is far more dynamic and competitive than the FTC’s narrow market definitions suggested. The court rightfully recognized the breadth of consumer choice and constant innovation shaping the digital ecosystem.

The court’s decision reinforces the principle that legitimate, value-creating innovation—even through strategic acquisition—is the lifeblood of the free market. By anchoring its decision in market realities, the court has preserved an innovation environment where businesses can grow and evolve without the fear of retroactive regulatory punishment.”– Turner Loesel, Policy Analyst, The James Madison Institute

###

The James Madison Institute is a 501(c)3 organization dedicated to the ideals of limited government, economic freedom, federalism and individual liberty coupled with individual responsibility. The institute conducts research on such issues as criminal justice, health care, taxes and regulatory environments.