In the Chiles case, Colorado officials claimed their enactment was a health measure. The justices likely recognized that this may have been a pretext. This essay was first published in the April 7, 2026 Epoch Times. On March 31, the Supreme Court…
People gradually get fed up with the Third-World style “progressive” delusions . . . . Perhaps the…
The memorandum is a "smoking gun" from a conspiracy to block a state-driven constitutional…
The author of this order is not a “legal illiterate.” He is a cynical grandstander . . . This…
This article first appeared in the March 24, 2026 issue of The Missoulian. I appear regularly on…
The Major Questions Doctrine is in the Constitution because it simply is the logical obverse of the Doctrine of Incidental Authority, which pervades the Constitution. This essay first appeared on March 11, 2026 in Law & Liberty. Justice Neil…
When the Constitution was adopted, international law required declarations only for offensive, not…
MSU Denver documents show that the bizarre and the extremist positions of its Writing Center prevail…
Tax and expenditure limitations in state constitutions—known to cognoscenti as “TELs”—vary in their…
Learning Resources v. Trump was a lost opportunity to begin the process of nudging Congress back…
Welcome, Login to your account.
Welcome, Create your new account
A password will be e-mailed to you.