Constitution
The “Armed Persons” Snafu in the Montana Constitution
This article first appeared in the March 24, 2026 issue of The Missoulian. I appear regularly on Montana radio to answer audience questions about the federal and state constitutions. During an appearance in early January, several callers discussed an…
Justice Gorsuch’s Take on the Major Questions Doctrine
The Major Questions Doctrine is in the Constitution because it simply is the logical obverse of the…
Does the Constitution require a declaration of war for…
When the Constitution was adopted, international law required declarations only for offensive, not…
Taxpayer-Supported Discrimination and Propaganda at MSU…
MSU Denver documents show that the bizarre and the extremist positions of its Writing Center prevail…
Constitutions of Liberty – Colorado, Montana &…
Tax and expenditure limitations in state constitutions—known to cognoscenti as “TELs”—vary in their…
The Tariff Case—A Lost Opportunity (exclusive analysis for II)
Learning Resources v. Trump was a lost opportunity to begin the process of nudging Congress back into its constitutional cage. by Rob Natelson Exclusive for the Independence Institute Although the media falsely brand the current Supreme Court as…
Justice Thomas gives Rob his 41st SCOTUS citation–one…
Supreme Court justices have relied on Rob's research 41 times since 2013, one of the highest…
The 1876 Colorado Constitution’s extensive bill of…
The 1876 Colorado Constitution protected economic and civil rights not found in the U.S.…
Lefty Claims that by Curbing Government Waste, Musk…
The truth is that under a fair reading of the Constitution, most of the projects DOGE found were…
Tax, spending and debt limits in Colorado’s 1876…
Colorado politicians who whine about the restrictions in TABOR should read the original Colorado…
TRENDING
